<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Over Already?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.protoscopic.com/articles/is-twitter-over-already/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.protoscopic.com/articles/is-twitter-over-already</link>
	<description>An experiment in Internet Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Land Rover</title>
		<link>http://www.protoscopic.com/articles/is-twitter-over-already#comment-8638</link>
		<dc:creator>Land Rover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protoscopic.com/?p=149#comment-8638</guid>
		<description>I think it has value still in the same way you are gravitating to smaller social sites instead of digg.  Because you can still be followed by people in your niche.  I still follow tweets for a select few tweeters in niche&#039;s that interest me, and I read those tweets, and get value from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it has value still in the same way you are gravitating to smaller social sites instead of digg.  Because you can still be followed by people in your niche.  I still follow tweets for a select few tweeters in niche&#8217;s that interest me, and I read those tweets, and get value from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

